Following the prompt return of my tutor report for A5 and the conclusion of BoW I feel a slight sadness that things have come to a close. Although of course there is much to look forward to and keep me busy, letting go and knowing when to finish is part of project culture, something I am familiar with in my nomadic professional life. Still it is nice to look back on a project and process with some fondness. As Robert says “art is a process” that is “never complete”. Very true, creative practice is cyclical and offers a continual return to a world that is strange and familiar.Read More
I had my first tutorial and report from Gina, my tutor for SYP. It was a very positive discussion on the presentation and variety of feedback I requested from my network in producing A1. Overall this was a very satisfying conclusion to the first part of SYP and a sense of closure as I have spent much of the summer months consolidating work. Operating a a much slower pace than previously is still a learning curve for me and part of my need to manage my own expectations.Read More
Having received my tutor report for A4 from Robert, I must admit I felt reassured that the conceptual was well received going forward. The time gap between A3 and interventions for me made the assignment take on an added pressure to deliver after the big build up. This was compounded by the limited time I could undertake the work so overall I feel happy about the feedback and glad I continued to take risks. And now going on with A5, to continue producing a few more formations and interventions so I can select from a wider group of case studies is a clear enough brief.Read More
As I mentioned in my reflection, I am very satisfied with how the critical thinking has developed in A3. Especially after some of the convoluting of theory in A2. So not only am I pleased to see this rewarded in my tutor report, but also the encouragement to continue to read and take risks in my work. Overall the report was very positive and through my tutorial and follow-up emails with Robert, I was able to find a good balance of theory without creating a referential overload. My thinking has been quite deep for what looks a simple abstraction process, but I think the continued sharing with my tutor and study group peers has helped me to distill this into something much more concise.Read More
I received the feedback for A2 Shadowgram from my tutor. Here I will break down how I would like to reflect on the input.
Firstly the thing I disagree with is that I haven't explained my ideas in my notes. At the very least I would say that I have been clear in how I came to the creative strategy and developed it. I wrote posts that established the idea, consolidated it through printing, replaced printing with post-production and lastly played with exposure time. I also wrote about how the work of Uta Barth challenged me on how to differentiate my approach photographing light on the interior space.Read More
I received my feedback for A1 Shadow and Surface from Robert. I have been reluctant to move too far ahead with my ideas for BoW in order to acknowledge the input.
This assignment was executed only with my smartphone, although I have been carrying out further experiments with my camera in the domestic space. The feedback for the use of the smartphone has been very positive from Robert as in my previous module and his encouragement of the risk element in my work was nice to read. It seems to tap into the impulsiveness of street photography without creating a story. Robert expressed a little concern about me being more interested in form over content, and not to dismiss content but to find a balance. Perhaps I should clarify here a little, it is more that I am not interested in narrative and that abstraction is the direction I am pursuing.Read More